Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

Latest Posts

It is well settled that in case the books of accounts are rejected the income of the business in which the Assessee was engaged can be determined by estimating the profit rate considering past history.

Loading

INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. ASHOK KUMAR PROP. M/S CHHABRA TIMBER STORE IN THE ITAT CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’ N.K. SAINI, VP & RAJPAL YADAV, JM. ITA No. 12/Chd/2019 8 Nov, 2019 Section 36(1)(iii), 44AB, 133A, 143(1), 143(3), 144, 145(3 Asst. Year…
Read more

133A, 143(1), 143(3), 144, 145(3), 36(1)(iii), 44AB, Chandigarh ITAT

November 16, 2019

Though the limitation period is available for passing the order, not for service but as per the settled issue, the order must be served on the assessee within the reasonable time otherwise Order is Annulled.

Loading

Nov 8, 2019-ITAT VISHAKAPATNAM hold that The additional ground is admitted if it goes to the root of the order. Though the limitation period is available for passing the order, not for service but as per the settled issue, the…
Read more

263-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue, Limitation period, Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Section 263, VISHAKAPATNAM TRIBUNAL

November 16, 2019

Nov 8, 2019-ITAT VISHAKAPATNAM hold that The additional ground is admitted if it goes to the root of the order.

Loading

Nov 8, 2019-ITAT VISHAKAPATNAM hold that The additional ground is admitted if it goes to the root of the order. Though the limitation period is available for passing the order, not for service but as per the settled issue, the…
Read more

263-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue, Additional Ground, Limitation period, Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Section 263, VISHAKAPATNAM TRIBUNAL

November 16, 2019

1.4.2017 से केवल धारा 143(2) की प्रोसिडिंग के आधार पर करदाता का रिफंड नहीं रोका जा सकता

Loading

केवल धारा 143(2) की प्रोसिडिंग के आधार पर करदाता का रिफंड नहीं रोका जा सकता 14th Oct;2019 को दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने फैसला देते हुए कहा कि 1.4.2017 से धारा 241 हटा दी गई है। धारा 241A के प्रावधानों के अनुसार…
Read more

141(1)(D), 143(2), 241, 241A, Delhi High Court

November 16, 2019

No valid addition can be made by merely proceeded to make allegation of suppression of production on the basis of excess consumption of manufacturing cost and electricity consumption it cannot be concluded that the assessee’s books of account were not reliable or the assessee is engaged in producing finished goods outside the books of account.

Loading

On 4th Nov, 2019, ITAT CUTTACK held that no valid addition can be made by merely proceeded to make allegation of suppression of production on the basis of excess consumption of manufacturing cost and electricity consumption it cannot be concluded…
Read more

145(3), ITAT CUTTACK

November 16, 2019

सही पते पर आयकर नोटिस नहीं भेजने पर धारा 271(1)(b) का ऑर्डर रद्द किया गया

Loading

सही पते पर आयकर नोटिस नहीं भेजने पर धारा 271(1)(b) का ऑर्डर रद्द किया गया इनकम टैक्स अपीलेट ट्रिब्यूनल दिल्ली बेंच ने फैसला देते हुए कहा कि अगर नोटिस धारा 271(1)(b) का उस एड्रेस पर दिया है जो पैन कार्ड…
Read more

271(1)(b), Delhi Tribunal

November 16, 2019

अगर कदाता को धारा 143(3) द्वारा पारित ऑर्डर्स में किसी छूट को लगातार दिया जा रहा है तो कर निर्धारण अधिकारी को principle of of consistency के आधार पर वह छूट देनी पड़ेगी राजकोट ट्रिब्यूनल के 20.9.2019 के फैसले

Loading

SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT CO-OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RAJKOT TRIBUNAL RAJPAL YADAV, JM & WASEEM AHMED, AM. ITA No. 262-263/Rjt/2018 Sep 20, 2019 (2019) 57 CCH 0073 RajkotTrib Legislation Referred to Section 36(1)(va), 80P(2)(b), 80P(2)(d)…
Read more

143(3), Principle of consistency, Rajkot Tribunal

November 16, 2019

कर निर्धारण अधिकारी के आर्डर में भूल सुधार के लिए धारा 154 में एप्लीकेशन लगाने पर इसी आधार पर अपील पेंडिंग होने का कारण देकर एप्लीकेशन खारिज नहीं की जा सकती

Loading

# Section 154, 154(1A) कर निर्धारण अधिकारी के आर्डर में भूल सुधार के लिए धारा 154 में एप्लीकेशन लगाने पर इसी आधार पर अपील पेंडिंग होने का कारण देकर एप्लीकेशन खारिज नहीं की जा सकती बोम्बे हाई कोर्ट ने ४…
Read more

154, 154(1A), Bobmay High Court, High Court, rectification of mistake

November 16, 2019

परिवार में सहायता के लिए रोकड़ दिए धन पर धारा 269SS का उल्लंघन नहीं एवं धारा 271D में पेनल्टी नहीं CUTTACK TRIBUNAL ‌Sept 23,2019

Loading

धारा 269SS का उल्लंघन नहीं एवं धारा 271D में पेनल्टी नहीं अगर परिवार के सदस्य को जमीन खरीदने या मेडिकल सहायता के लिए रोकड़ दिए और वापस लिए हैं और उसका उद्देश्य लोन नहीं है। CUTTACK TRIBUNAL ‌Sept 23,2019 को…
Read more

269SS, 271D, Cuttack ITAT

November 16, 2019

Retraction of statement given in search u/s132(4). Mere admission of additional income would not automatically entitle the assessing officer to assess the same, if the assessee disputes the same subsequently with corroborative evidences. IT-CASES-202-2020

Loading

Retraction of statement given u/s132(4). It has been held in various cases and now again confirmed on dated 4 September, 2019 by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Bangalore Sri Srinivasa Educational & … vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income … on…
Read more

132, retraction

November 16, 2019

Post navigation

← Previous 1 … 24 25 26 27 28 … 52 Next →

Categories

  • 1860 (1)
  • 1956 (1)
  • 1973 (1)
  • 2002 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • Articles (78)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (59)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure (0)
  • Companies Act (2)
  • Constitution of India (2)
  • Cr.P.C. (2)
  • Due dates (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (6)
  • GST (59)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (47)
  • HUF Property (1)
  • Income Tax (307)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • Indian Penal Code (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (3)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (9)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • PMLA Act (1)
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act (1)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)

    • Archives

    • January 2025
    • July 2024
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • July 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • Rectify the filed GSTR-1 return in order to get ITC benefit
    • Whether claim of exemption under section 54F is allowable for capital gain on sale of shares which was sold in lieu of plot and construction and thereafter assessee made further payment towards remaining construction. The permission of transfer of property was not obtained in the time period as available in section 54F. ITAT KOLKATA allowed the deduction u/s 54F in the case of Basabdutta Dutta v. ITO vide IT APPEAL NO. 868 (KOL.) OF 2023 [AY 2014-15] on dated 11.07.2024. FCA BPMUNDRA 9314501680
    • CASH DEPOSITED DURING DEMONETISATION PROPERLY RECORDED IN BOOKS. DISALLOWANCE DELETED FCA BPMUNDRA 9314501680
    • Can AO made the addition ignoring the claim of the assessee that the cash withdrawn from the bank was available with the assessee for the deposit in the bank account?Section 69A
    • Can invocation of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 by CIT is sustainable by holding the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue in respect of issue which was not a reason for selection of the case for limited scrutiny?