Latest Posts

Section 148, 147:Client Code Modification is reason to suspect and not reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Re-assessment is quashed. STRATAGEM PORTFOLIO (P.) LTD. vs. DCIT. ITAT DELHI BENCH AY 2010-11. In favour of Assessee.

STRATAGEM PORTFOLIO (P.) LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IN THE ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ BHAVNESH SAINI, JM & O.P. KANT, AM. ITA No. 7878/Del./2019 Sep 15, 2020 Section 148, 147 AY 2010-11 Decision in favour of: Assessee …
Read more

147, 148, AY 2010-11, Delhi Tribunal, In Favour of Assessee

September 19, 2020

आजकल छापा पड़ने से कैसे बचें

1☺. आयकर छापे का मुख्य उद्देश्य आयकर की चोरी को पकड़ना है आयकर की चोरी को रोकना है आयकर का छापा पड़ने का मुख्य कारण इन में से एक है a. धारा 131(1) या 142(1) में आए नोटिस का विधिवत…
Read more

Articles, आयकर छापा

September 15, 2020

Section 14A For the purpose of computing disallowance u/s 14A of the Act instead of taking into account total investment, only such investments which yielded exempt dividend income during the year are required to be considered for the purpose of disallowance. RELIGARE SECURITIES LTD. & ANR. vs. DCIT. In favour of Assessee. ITAT Delhi

For the purpose of computing disallowance u/s 14A of the Act instead of taking into account total investment, only such investments which yielded exempt dividend income during the year are required to be considered for the purpose of disallowance The…
Read more

14A, 28, AY 2011-12, Delhi Tribunal, In Favour of Assessee, In favour of Assessee (Partly), Matter remanded, Rule 8D, Section 32

September 8, 2020

इस जग में कैसे रहे-मेरी एक कविता

इस जग में कैसे रहे प्रभु की लीला का परम आनंद कैसे प्राप्त करें इस पर इशारा करती मेरी यह कविता अद्भुत महिमा तेरी हैं भगवन, हम इस जग क्यों आए तेरा भक्त ही जान पाया है है निराकार भगवान…
Read more

Happiness, कविता

August 22, 2020

How to face efficiently Income Tax Search & Seizure

How to face efficiently Income Tax Search & Seizure 1. We should understand that the sole objective of income tax raid is to unearth tax avoidance. Generally it leads to chaos and vacuity as it is incredulous and any unexpected…
Read more

Articles, incriminating material, Search, Seizure

August 22, 2020

दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने 1 अगस्त 2017 को फैसला देते हुए कहा कि आयकर छापे के दौरान धारा 132 4 में लिए गए स्टेटमेंट अपने आप में incriminating material नहीं है केवल इस आधार पर ना तो assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153 A हो सकता है और ना ही कोई एडिशन किया जा सकता है.PCIT vs.BEST INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS. IT-CASES-208-2020

दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने 1 अगस्त 2017 को फैसला देते हुए कहा कि आयकर छापे के दौरान धारा 132 4 में लिए गए स्टेटमेंट अपने आप में incriminating material नहीं है केवल इस आधार पर ना तो assumption of jurisdiction u/s…
Read more

132, 132(4), 153A, AY 2005-06, AY 2006-07, AY 2007-08, AY 2008-09, AY 2009-10, Decisions, Delhi, Delhi High Court, High Court, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material, Search and seizure, Statement, Statement under section 132(4)

August 20, 2020

Section 10(13A), Rule 2A(h)‘Performance bonus’ does not form part of ‘salary’ as defined in clause (h) of Rule 2A for the purposes of section 10(13A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Sudip Rungta v. Dy. CIT held on 10 January, 2020

Section 10(13A), Rule 2A(h). ‘Performance bonus’ does not form part of ‘salary’ as defined in clause (h) of Rule 2A for the purposes of section 10(13A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Sudip Rungta v. Dy. CIT held on 10 January,…
Read more

10(13A), In Favour of Assessee, Kolkata tribunal, Rule 2A, Rule 2A(h)

August 18, 2020

80G Requirements

B.P.Mundra & Co. Chartered Accountants Mundra House, A 822, Shivaji Nagar, Civil Lines, Adjoining Hawa Sadak, 22 Godown Bridge, Jaipur-302 001 Dial 2370113, 2225110, 2225116, 3291113 Res.2394224, 3249436, 2811601 Email: [email protected] Dated…
Read more

HOW TO, Income Tax-How to

August 13, 2020

Section 28(ii)(a),28(ii)(a) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 22, 2020 that the payment received as non-competition fee under a negative covenant was always treated as a capital receipt till Assessment Year 2003-2004. SHIV RAJ GUPTA vs.CIT

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 22, 2020 that the payment received as non-competition fee under a negative covenant was always treated as a capital receipt till Assessment Year 2003-2004. SHIV RAJ GUPTA vs.CIT SHIV RAJ GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER…
Read more

28, 28(ii)(a), AY 1995-96, Section 28(ii)(a)

Section 40(a)(ia), 194C: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 29, 2020 that the provisions of Section 194C were indeed applicable and the assessee-appellant was under obligation to deduct the tax at source in relation to the payments made by it for hiring the vehicles for the purpose of its business of transportation of goods. Against the assessee.SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

Section 40(a)(ia), 194C: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 29, 2020 that the provisions of Section 194C were indeed applicable and the assessee-appellant was under obligation to deduct the tax at source in relation to the payments made by it for…
Read more

194C, 40(a)(ia), AY 2005-06, In favour of Revenue, Supreme Court