-
ITAT Mumbai on 16th March 2020 held that the Additions merely on the basis of statements made during survey proceedings u/s 133A would not hold much evidentiary value unless the same were backed up by some cogent corroborative material.
-
ITAT Mumbai on 16th March 2020 held that the Retraction of a statement of a particular person by another person statement is bad and disregarded for all purposes.
-
ITAT COCHIN held on Mar 13, 2020 that if Primary agricultural credit society give Loan for agricultural purpose then the assessee’s activities are in compliance with the activities of primary agricultural credit society and therefore claim of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I.T. Act can not be denied.
-
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS on Mar 3, 2020 hold that there is no capital gain on Refundable Security Deposit received through development agreement when owner continues to be owner throughout agreement, and has at no stage purported to transfer rights akin to ownership to developer—At highest, possession alone is given under agreement, and that too for a specific purpose, purpose being to develop property, as envisaged by all parties
-
ITAT Bangalore on Mar 13, 2020 hold that For reopening an assessment, the Assessing Officer cannot consider the information which is already on record and it should be from outside sources.
-
ITAT KOLKATA On 26.2.2020 held that it is settled legal proposition that the Sec. 263 revision jurisdiction is not attracted when there is absence of the corresponding assessment being both erroneous as well as causing prejudice to interest of the Revenue hence the order of PCIT to set aside the said assessment order and directing the A.O. to frame the assessment afresh is bad in law and facts.
-
11 मार्च 2020 अहमदाबाद ट्रिब्यूनल ने फेसला दिया कि अगर कर निर्धारण अधिकारी धारा 148 का नोटिस मृत व्यक्ति के नाम से दिया है और उसके उत्तराधिकारी नोटिस का जवाब देते हैं और उस समय कोई ऑब्जेक्शन नहीं उठाते हैं और कर निर्धारण अधिकारी उत्तराधिकारी के नाम से एसेसमेंट ऑर्डर करते हैं तो वह नोटिस 148 वैलिड रहेगा लेकिन चूंकि एसेसमेंट ऑर्डर केवल एक उत्तराधिकारी के खिलाफ है इस कारण सेट एसाइड किया गया की यह आर्डर सभी उत्तराधिकारी के खिलाफ किया जावे।
-
सोसाइटी या ट्रस्ट को कैपिटल या कॉरपस फंड के रूप में जो पैसा मिलता है वह टैक्सेबल नहीं है भले ही सोसाइटी या ट्रस्ट को 12A रजिस्ट्रेशन नहीं मिला हो।
-
Search case-Initiating the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and conducting the proceedings u/s 271AAA is bad in law. VISHAKAPATNAM BENCH ‘’ BENCH held on Mar 4, 2020
-
ITAT INDORE on 5th Feb, 2020 held that when the penalty notice issued by the assessing officer did not specify Which limb of section of the Act, the penalty proceedings had been initiated i.e., Whether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or to say the matter written in the body of the notice issued under section 274 of the Act does not refer to the charges of provision of section 271AAB of the Act makes the alleged notice defective and invalid and thus deserves to be quashed