-
Question: Whether assessment order would be void ab initio when the ld. Assessing Officer failed to issue a notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Further whether procsseding u/s 263 action can be taken: ITAT KOLKATA decided the issue on 27.8.2022
-
When CIT can pass order u/s 263 by holding that the order passed by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue? ITAT KOLKATA passed the order on 6th Jan 2021 in the case of RUNGTA MINES LTD. vs. PCIT?
-
Section 43(1), 143(3), 263 ITAT KOLKATA on May 29, 2020 hold that the industrial promotion assistance it received was on capital account.
-
Section 263 ITAT DELHI on May 14, 2020 Issues subject to revision u/s 263 were pertaining to original assessment u/s 143(3) and not the reopened assessment u/s 147; the limitation should also start from the original assessment. In this case as original assessment order u/s 143(3) of the act was passed on 16.01.2014, the revision thereof could have been taken up to 31.3.2016. Impugned order u/s 263 of the act was passed on 26/2/2019, therefore it is clearly beyond the limitation prescribed u/s 263 (2) of the act. JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD. vs. PCIT
-
ITAT Delhi on 31st jan; 2019 held that CIT(A) could not enhance income of assessee on altogether ‘new Source’. before submitting your written submission kindly read carefully the notes and read case laws mentioned.
-
Unless the bad debt is written off by debiting to the P&L account and the debtors’ account should be credited, the condition as contemplated u/s. 36(1)(vii) is not satisfied. judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Vijaya Bank Ltd. (supra) relied on by the assessee’s Counsel applies mainly to Banking companies Regarding allowability of Provision for bad debts. No infirmity was found in exercising power u/s 263 by CIT
-
ITAT KOLKATA On 26.2.2020 held that it is settled legal proposition that the Sec. 263 revision jurisdiction is not attracted when there is absence of the corresponding assessment being both erroneous as well as causing prejudice to interest of the Revenue hence the order of PCIT to set aside the said assessment order and directing the A.O. to frame the assessment afresh is bad in law and facts.
-
Though the limitation period is available for passing the order, not for service but as per the settled issue, the order must be served on the assessee within the reasonable time otherwise Order is Annulled.
-
Nov 8, 2019-ITAT VISHAKAPATNAM hold that The additional ground is admitted if it goes to the root of the order.
-
“…..Commissioner could exercise his jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act “only in cases where no enquiry is made by the assessing officer.” (Para 9) Aug 2, 2019 HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA