Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

Author Archive: admin

B.P.Mundra > Articles by: admin

AGRA TRIBUNAL held on 11th Sept 2018 that Merely because certain disallowance of expenses has been made, cannot itself justify imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.

Loading

AGRA TRIBUNAL held on 11th Sept 2018 that It is manifest from the facts recorded above that the penalty has been imposed with reference to disallowance of interest and commission expenses. It is not the case of the Revenue that…
Read more

271(1)(c)

November 16, 2019

Tran-1 form could not file owing to technical glitches in GST website, concerned ‎nodal officer who was directed to look into the issue and facilitate the uploading ‎of Form TRAN-1 without reference to any time frame

Loading

HIGH COURT OF KERALA held that here assessee was unable to file Tran-1 form within due date owing to technical ‎glitches in GST website and could not avail of Cenvat credit, the assessee was ‎granted liberty to approach to concerned…
Read more

GST, GSTR-1, technical glitches in GST website

November 16, 2019

INCENTIVE IN FORM OF DEDUCTION OF 30% OF THE EMOLUMENTS PAID TO ADDITIONAL ‎EMPLOYEES -SECTION 80JJA OF INCOME TAX ACT

Loading

80jjaINCENTIVE IN FORM OF DEDUCTION OF 30% OF THE EMOLUMENTS PAID TO ADDITIONAL ‎EMPLOYEES -SECTION 80JJA OF INCOME TAX ACT ‎1.‎ The Incentive has been made available to following:-‎ A.‎ all assesses having income under the head profits and gains…
Read more

80JJA, Deduction in respect of employment of new employees

November 16, 2019

Addition u/s 68 cannot be made where the assessee explains the source of the capital ‎contribution, established the identity of the creditor and also credit worthiness of the ‎parties.

Loading

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MULPURI FOODS ‎AND FEEDS PVT. LTD. VISHAKAPATNAM TRIBUNAL ITA No. 292/Viz/2017‎ Sep 26, 2018‎ ‎(2018) 54 CCH 0044 VishakapatnamTrib‎ Legislation Referred to Section 68, 263‎ Case pertains to Asst. Year 2012-2013‎ Decision in favour…
Read more

68, bogus share capital, VISHAKAPATNAM TRIBUNAL

November 16, 2019

On July 30, 2018 The High Court of Bombay held that no addition can be made in the hand of Company for share capital if the shareholders ‎is having PAN And gave affidavit

Loading

On July 30, 2018 The High Court of Bombay held that Investment made by the shareholders ‎is not hit by Section 68 of the Act if the persons who invested in the shares of the ‎respondent-assessee had PAN numbers allotted…
Read more

153(3), 153A, 68, Bobmay High Court

November 16, 2019

On Jul 16, 2018 it has been held by JAIPUR TRIBUNAL that denial of the claim ‎on the basis of suspicion without any cogent material to show that the assessee has ‎brought back his own unaccounted income in the shape of long term capital gain, the said ‎action of the AO is not sustainable

Loading

On Jul 16, 2018 it has been held by JAIPUR TRIBUNAL that denial of the claim ‎on the basis of suspicion without any cogent material to show that the assessee has ‎brought back his own unaccounted income in the shape…
Read more

10(38), Court or tribunal, Jaipur Tribunal, Penny stock

November 16, 2019

Penny Stock: Claiming of exemption u/s 10(38) is valid-transactions carried ‎through Demat Account, banking channel, STT paid, No Sebi Enquiry and no specific finding against the assessee

Loading

Penny Stock decision on 2nd Aug, 2018: Claiming of exemption u/s 10(38) is valid as transactions were carried ‎through Demat account and banking channel on which STT has been paid by assessee. Name ‎of the assessee did not appear therein…
Read more

10, 10(38), Penny stock

November 16, 2019

किसी एजुकेशन इंस्टीट्यूट द्वारा ट्रेनिंग एवं कंसल्टेंसी का कोई प्रोग्राम चलाया जाता है और उसमें आय होती हैं तो उस पर AO धारा 11 और 12 की छूट देने को इनकार नहीं कर सकता है अगर वह आय वेलफेयर एक्टिविटीज के लिए ही काम ली जाती हैं तथा वह आय स्कूल एजुकेशन आय का छोटा छोटा हिस्सा है

Loading

मित्रों कटक ट्रिब्यूनल ने XAVIER INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER के केस में 27 जुलाई 2018 को फैसला दिया है कि अगर किसी एजुकेशन इंस्टीट्यूट द्वारा ट्रेनिंग एवं कंसल्टेंसी का कोई प्रोग्राम चलाया जाता है और उसमें आय…
Read more

11, 12, 12A, 12AA

November 16, 2019

अगर कोई पार्टनर जमीन या अन्य fixed assets पार्टनरशिप फर्म में केपिटल के रूप में लाता है तो पार्टनरशिप फर्म में जो वैल्यू बुक्स में दिखाई जाएगी उसको consideration मानकर कैपिटल गेन का कैलकुलेशन होगा इसमें धारा 50C नहीं लगेगी

Loading

अगर कोई पार्टनर जमीन या अन्य fixed assets पार्टनरशिप फर्म में केपिटल के रूप में लाता है तो पार्टनरशिप फर्म में जो वैल्यू बुक्स में दिखाई जाएगी उसको consideration मानकर कैपिटल गेन का कैलकुलेशन होगा इसमें धारा 50C नहीं लगेगी…
Read more

45(3), 48, Cases Income tax

November 16, 2019

In the case of bogus purchases only profit element embedded in such purchases is ‎to be taxed but not total bogus purchases.

Loading

In the case of bogus purchases only profit element embedded in such purchases is ‎to be taxed but not total bogus purchases. ACIT v. Technotrade Impex ‎India Pvt. Ltd. & Vice-Versa ITA No. 5382 & 5383/Mum/2016, C.O.Nos.158 & 160/Mum/2017‎ When…
Read more

69, Bogus Purchases

November 16, 2019

Post navigation

← Previous 1 … 35 36 37 38 39 … 52 Next →

Categories

  • 1860 (1)
  • 1956 (1)
  • 1973 (1)
  • 2002 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • Articles (78)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (59)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure (0)
  • Companies Act (2)
  • Constitution of India (2)
  • Cr.P.C. (2)
  • Due dates (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (6)
  • GST (59)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (47)
  • HUF Property (1)
  • Income Tax (307)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • Indian Penal Code (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (3)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (9)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • PMLA Act (1)
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act (1)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)

    • Archives

    • January 2025
    • July 2024
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • July 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • Rectify the filed GSTR-1 return in order to get ITC benefit
    • Whether claim of exemption under section 54F is allowable for capital gain on sale of shares which was sold in lieu of plot and construction and thereafter assessee made further payment towards remaining construction. The permission of transfer of property was not obtained in the time period as available in section 54F. ITAT KOLKATA allowed the deduction u/s 54F in the case of Basabdutta Dutta v. ITO vide IT APPEAL NO. 868 (KOL.) OF 2023 [AY 2014-15] on dated 11.07.2024. FCA BPMUNDRA 9314501680
    • CASH DEPOSITED DURING DEMONETISATION PROPERLY RECORDED IN BOOKS. DISALLOWANCE DELETED FCA BPMUNDRA 9314501680
    • Can AO made the addition ignoring the claim of the assessee that the cash withdrawn from the bank was available with the assessee for the deposit in the bank account?Section 69A
    • Can invocation of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 by CIT is sustainable by holding the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue in respect of issue which was not a reason for selection of the case for limited scrutiny?